<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Systems |</title><link>https://sanaamironov.com/tags/systems/</link><atom:link href="https://sanaamironov.com/tags/systems/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Systems</description><generator>HugoBlox Kit (https://hugoblox.com)</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>What Trustworthy Computing Means to Me</title><link>https://sanaamironov.com/blog/what-trustworthy-computing-means-to-me/</link><pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://sanaamironov.com/blog/what-trustworthy-computing-means-to-me/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Trustworthy computing is not one property. It is a relationship between systems, evidence, people, and decisions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For me, the phrase connects several interests: operating systems that can provide evidence, data systems that can represent quality and provenance, AI tools that can be governed responsibly, and interfaces that help people understand when to trust a result.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The common thread is accountability. A trustworthy system should not merely output an answer. It should help explain the conditions under which that answer should be believed.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>